The upcoming visit of Usha Vance, the Second Lady of the United States, to Greenland has ignited significant backlash from local leaders and citizens. Scheduled for March 27 to March 29, Vance’s trip is intended to coincide with Greenland’s national dogsled race, the Avannaata Qimussersu, and is framed by the White House as a cultural outreach aimed at celebrating Greenlandic heritage. However, this initiative has been met with accusations of imperialism and aggression from Greenlandic officials.
Greenland’s Prime Minister Múte B. Egede has been particularly vocal in his criticism, labelling the visit as “highly aggressive.” He argues that the presence of U.S. officials, including National Security Adviser Mike Waltz, signals an ulterior motive beyond mere cultural appreciation. Egede contends that the involvement of a national security adviser is indicative of an attempt to assert dominance over Greenland rather than promote goodwill. He expressed concerns that this visit could intensify American pressure in light of President Donald Trump’s previous statements regarding the annexation of Greenland.
The backdrop to this diplomatic controversy is Trump’s ongoing interest in acquiring Greenland, a territory rich in rare earth minerals crucial for high-tech industries. Despite firm rejections from both Denmark and Greenland regarding any proposals for annexation, Trump’s rhetoric has raised alarms about U.S. intentions in the Arctic region. Egede noted that Greenlanders feel their diplomatic efforts are being disregarded by the Trump administration, which appears focused on asserting control over the territory.
In response to the planned visit, leaders in Greenland have announced a boycott of Usha Vance’s activities during her stay. Jens-Frederik Nielsen, who is expected to lead Greenland following recent elections, echoed Egede’s sentiments, describing the timing of the visit as disrespectful given ongoing negotiations for greater autonomy and independence from Denmark.
While the White House maintains that Vance’s trip is about cultural engagement and unity, scepticism remains among Greenlanders who view it as a provocative move amid heightened geopolitical tensions. The situation underscores the fragile nature of U.S.-Greenland relations and raises questions about how such diplomatic efforts will be received by a population increasingly wary of foreign interference.